During a recent visit to the North, Captain Bhag Singh, the Honorary Managing Editor of The Sikh Review had an occasion to meet the present Nawab of Materkotla. The Nawab Sahib informed him in the course of their meeting that his celebrated ancestor, who appealed to the Viceroy of Sirhind not to execute the two younger sons (aged nine and seven years) of Guru Gobind Singh, also sent a petition to Emperor Aurangzeb, urging him, in the name of equity and justice and Islam, to spare the children.
The Nawab Sahib has sent a photostat copy of that petition which forms part of the Malerkotla archives. This has been reproduced in this issue, along with its translation in English.
After the evacuation of Anandpur, Guru Gobind Singh’s mother, Mata Gujri, and younger sons Jujhar Singh and Fateh Singh, had taken refuge with an old Brahmin servant of the family, Gangu, who lured by the charm of the valuables in their procession betrayed them to the Viceroy of Sirhind. The boys were committed to trial by the Viceroy and were condemned to be walled up alive. Mata Gujri succumbed to her sorrow at the fate that befell the children.
“While the Guru was listening to the narrative, he was digging up a shrub with his knife. He said, ‘as I dig up this shrub by the roots, so shall the Turks be extirpated.’ He inquired if anyone except the Nawab of Malerkotla had spoken on behalf of the children. The messenger replied in the negative. The Guru then said that after the roots of the oppressive Turks were all dug up, the roots of the Nawab should still remain. His Sikhs should one day come and lay Sirhind waste.” (Macaulife, The Sikh Religion, Vol. V-VI p.199-200)
It now appears that the then Nawab of Malerkotla did not rest content with an appeal to the Viceroy, but petitioned the Emperor himself when his intercession on behalf of the innocent children with the Viceroy proved fruitless.
The Nawab of Malerkotla's humaneness has filled the Sikh people with a lasting sense of gratitude.
After the break up of the Mughal empire, the Punjab has passed through innumerable vicissitudes. But the Sikhs have, with occasional interruptions always had the upper hand in the politics of the region. Even as Maharaja Ranjit Singh established a mighty kingdom in western Punjab and North Western India, a hegemony of powerful Sikh bodies carved out states for themselves in Eastern Punjab. The tiny State of Malerkotla is hemmed in by the Sikh states of Patiala, Nabha and Farid Kot. But even in those days of instability when might determined the right, Malerkotla was left untouched and unharmed.
A more severe test of the Sikh gratitude, however, came much more recently when the Punjab and Bengal were plunged in a wild and widespread communal turmoil in 1946-47. Indescribable Muslim excesses over the non-Muslims in the Muslim majority areas of West Punjab provoked the wildest retaliation in the Sikh dominated areas of East Punjab. While communal frenzy reigned supreme all around, the State of Malerkotla became a Muslim sanctuary. Malerkotla's was a soil sacred to the Sikhs. Not a hair of a Muslim's head could be touched on this soil.
Those of us, who have had the ill fortune of seeing and living through that shameful saga of the butchery of the unprotected innocent in the two Punjabs, offer numerous eyewitness accounts of how hotly pursued Muslim individuals stopped short immediately on crossing into the territory of Malerkota and were abandoned to themselves. The piercing points of the attackers' spears would not get across the boundary of Malerkotla, it looked as though an invisible steel wall rose at the border.
The story of Malerkotla has a charming, tender moral: Humaneness and gestures of charity build bridges between peoples of divers and even
hostile persuasions. Mankind needs such bridges more today than it ever before did. We, in India and Pakistan, need them much more. Our tempers are frayed, our moods dark. Even if we plunge ourselves into conflict, which will of course be suicidal, we must, in the name of God and of the religion that we profess, ensure that the bridges, like the one that the Nawab of Malerkotla built and the Sikhs of the following generations kept in good repair are built and are not broken. This we can do by being magnanimous in triumph, humane inspite of provocation and above all civilized men while dealing with things sacred to our adversaries.
Editor The Sikh Review
Copy of the petition from Nawab of Materkotla to Emperor Aurangzeb (1705 AD)
The Sikh Review, January 1967
ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF AN APPEAL IN PERSIAN
By
NAWAB SHER MOHAMMAD KHAN OF MALERKOTLA STATE
Presented to
THE IMPERIAL MAJESTY MOHIUD-DIN AURANGZEB ALMGIR
EMPEROR OF INDIA, 1705 AD
O mighty king of the world who,
on account of justice has placed thy throne
on the Azure Vault; may the dappled horse of
the skies be ever under thy control because
thou hast eclipsed the brilliance of the Sun and
Moon by the splendour of thy innumerable victories.
The humble and devoted petitioner, with all respect due to the grandeur of the Shadow of God and to the might of the saviour of the world, most respectfully begs to lay his humble appeal before Your Most Gracious Majesty, and hopes from Your Imperial Majesty's unfathomable kindness and illimitable magnanimity that the August person of the Shadow of God, viceregent of the Holy Prophet (Peace be on him) in this world, the incarnation of God's mercy over his creatures, by sheer munificence, be pleased to bestow his compassion and forgiveness on the young sons of Gobind Singh, the Tenth Guru of the Sikh Nation.
The Viceroy of Sirhind Province, with a view to avenging the disobedience and disloyal activities of the Guru which might have been committed by him, has, without any fault or crime of the guiltless or innocent children simply on the basis of their being the scions of Guru Gobind Singh, condemned these minor sons liable to execution and has proposed to wall them up alive till they die.
Although no one dares to raise an objection against the order of the Viceroy whose order is as inevitable as death, yet the faithful servants and well wishers of your August Majesty's Empire deem it most advisable to humbly appeal and to bring to Your Majesty's benign notice. May it be said that if, in view of certain important political considerations, Your Majesty is disposed to inflict suitable punishment on the Sikh Nation for their undesirable activities in the past, it would be quite compatible with justice, but Your Majesty's humble and devoted servant thinks that it would, in no way, be consistent with the principles of sovereignity and supreme power to wreak vengeance of the misdeeds of a whole nation on two innocent children who, on account of their tender age, are quite innocent and unable to take a stand against the all-powerful Viceroy.
This sort of action obviously appears to be against the dictates of Islam and the laws propounded by the Founder of Islam (may God's blessings be showered on him) and Your Majesty's humble servant is afraid that the enactment of such an atrocious act would perpetually remain an ugly blot on the face of Your Majesty's renowed justice and righteousness. It may graciously be considered that the mode of inflicting the punishment and torture as contemplated by the Viceroy of Sirhind can by no means be considered compatible with the principles of supreme rule, equity and justice.
In view of the above considerations Your Majesty's humble and devoted servant most respectfully takes the liberty of suggesting that if Your Majesty considers it expedient, that the sons of Guru Gobind Singh may be kept under restraint from indulging in disloyal activities it would be more appropriate if they could be interned in the Royal capital at Delhi, till they are duly reformed, so as to willingly acknowledge allegiance and loyalty to the throne. In the alternative both the boys may be placed under my care so as to keep a check on their actions and movements and not to allow them to entertain any kind of ideas of sedition or disloyalty in their minds.
Although the humble petitioner fears that this humble appeal which is prompted exclusively by the sense of veracity and loyality to the throne may be deemed as transgressing the limits of propriety, yet the fear of God and the urge of faith does not allow the suppression of truth. If this humble appeal has the honour of meeting the Royal acceptance it shall be most fortunate. If, however, unfortunately it is deprived of the honour of acceptance, still Your Majesty's humble and devoted servant shall have the consolation of having performed the sacred duty of expressing what was right and just and not having allowed his pen to deviate in the expression of truth.