SikhSpectrum.com Monthly Issue No. 13, August 2003
Water on the cobblestones
A. Singh
This article has been written for the cutter drifting out to deep water in the
floating world. This is for gardeners who appreciate that day in the year
when the red rose they have cultivated is in full bloom and at the height of
its beauty, ready to be cut down and set in a porcelain urn between a miser
and his gold, or between two warriors, or between a veera and God.
Which is the more substantial, thicker, and more alive potion: blood or
water? The answer to this question is the crux of existence. If blood is the
potent vehicle for the living energy, that mysterious force that sustains life,
then is it not superior to water? However, water is necessary to life, and
without this simple substance there would be no living being, with or
without blood in its veins. However, this comparison of qualities appears
to lead nowhere, like a spiralling staircase into the abyss. This argument is
similar to the comparison of qualities between the man with the knife and
the man with the stick. Who has the advantage? If it's the man with the
stick, then the man with the knife can always cut a stick for himself, etc.
The power to make use of qualities and attributes is the end of pursuits to
develop skill, or cunning or crafts. That such pursuits in themselves are the
Way has been the argument of questors throughout the ages. It is
submitted that among these questors there is a failure to appreciate a self-
evident trigronometric pattern (trigram) of dissimilation and dissolution.
Initially, the pursuit is discovered, either by accident or by intent. Then, the
pursuit is followed, until the time comes when the pursuit becomes
synonymous with the purpose of its establishment or its founder.
As the
purpose of the establishment or founder begins to evolve and fragment to
suit the prejudices of the practitioners, the purity is lost. The pursuit,
attempting to assume the shape-shifting adaptability and level-finding
stability of water, sheds its purity. At this point, the qualities and values of
water are emulated by the questors in their pursuit, and the pursuit itself
changes, the original purpose and method being lost. Therefore the pursuit
has reached the natural end of its life, but this will not necessarily be
noticed by the questor, who may believe that the altered form is the
unadulterated original. This is the characteristic of water, in movement.
Water in movement being the vehicle within the vehicle - but not
necessarily the engine - of life, when water is understood to be the
principal component of blood, is the only conclusion that may be drawn
from the cultivation of any pursuit. Drawing out the implications of this
hypothesis, it is possible to conceive a pursuit in which the water attributes
itself are the end. If there is any truth in water, then naturally one would not
expect water to deceive itself in the practice of such a pursuit. However,
before proceeding to explore the possible outcomes our uber-pursuit, it
behoves us to ask what the function of movement in water is. Naturally, a
living being cannot function if its blood did not move about inside it.
Similarly, if the blood inside it is contaminated with some foreign agent,
and is not regularly cleaned, the being would die.
From the perspective of a pursuit to cultivate mastery, the necessity of
movement is equally apparent with regard to the avoidance of dirt,
contamination and filth, and in order to avoid stagnation. For the sake of
honouring the original purpose or the founder of such a pursuit, a questor
may disdain to interfere with its substance. In such an instance, there is a
clear chance of infection being allowed to take hold, introduced by
another, for good or ill, who is less inhibited. In those circumstances,
where it is too late or not possible to administer preventative medicine, the
letting of blood for the purpose of maintaining the purity of the water
would appear to be justifiable.
The ultimately pure water is the water that cleanses the water within other
pursuits. Therefore, the pursuit that causes injury to an infected cause for
the purpose of honouring the water within itself and that other cause, is the
true and proper pursuit, for all other pursuits are subject to dissolution.
Extending this principle to questions of morality and ethics, there would
appear to be justification for a master-morality that would impose its own
morality by force upon other systems of morality and ethics, while
conscious not only of the fluidity and changing faces of the other systems,
but its own susceptibility to change also. This master school would be too
imperious, dynamic and well-intended to present as a form of fascism.
Rather, it would have ultimate mastery of and over fascism and all other
dogmas.
The understanding behind the questor employing this over-system as a
pursuit, would be that ultimately, the blood that falls to the cobblestones is
sacred for the intent behind the blade that freed it from its infected host.
Thereafter, the water from rains or hose washing the cobblestones clean,
while ever present and anticipated in the mind of the cutter even in the
initial cutting action, is not the end in itself but is an expression of the
purity that has been sought, irrespective of whether the momentary object
of purifying the host body has been achieved. Therefore, the action itself,
irrespective of whether the object of the moment has been achieved or not,
is a true and correct action in pursuit of the Way.
Furthermore, for the
reasons already explained, this action would have been in the pursuit of a
Way superior to a superficially comparable pursuit involving unloaded
cutting, or cutting of bales of hay, or cutting beasts or carcases. The most
practicable method of employ, in the transition between the ordinary (if
you could call it that) and the superior pursuit, would be to maintain
transience between the pursuits ordinarily cultivated by the conscious, and
the pursuits of the trigram-conscious.
The driving force behind the motion of the water, sustaining life, is the
engine of the blood in the living being. From the perspective of the
trigonometric continuum, which is naturally irrefutable and therefore stable
(hence being upward-pointing, one side resting on the ground), the driving
motion must therefore assume the form of its direct equivalent, opposed
exactly in every way, but always unbalanced so that there is motion.
Therefore, it must take the form of a triangle approximately equal to the
truth of change water triangle already discussed, yet poised unsteadily on
the ground - an (almost) equilateral triangle with one of its points and no
other part of it being in contact with the ground. This can be taken to be
the symbolic representation of the movement in the water, which causes it
to adopt a form, fill a space, attain a level, or gain or lose heat.
Naturally,
it
is inseparable from the water, and yet it is not equal to the water. Were the
triangle perfectly equal-sided and not biased in any way, there would be no
movement nor change in the state of the water. The bias itself is either be
controlled by free will, whether in the host of the blood-carrying unit or in
the host of the blood-letting unit, or else it is predestined. This is a matter
of one's personal philosophy, and can neither be proved nor disproved.
All that can be proved by this model is that the pursuer possessing the
master-morality is at complete liberty to control the lives of others as they
pursue minor or major aims, by judicious exercise of dissection:
prevention and cure (checks and challenges).
The tool of this discrimination emanating from instinct (as discussed
already, instinct is the ultimate pursuit of the pursuer of water) as opposed
to reason, the use of the dissecting instrument in relation to others is not
free from consequence, but is guided by understanding of consequence.
Therefore, that knife, wielded in the quest for water, may be used for either
life-saving surgery or for war, and the ultimate outcome, irrespective of the
motives of the wielder and irrespective whether the intended outcome is
achieved not at all or in whole or in part, will be "good".
The inverted triangle, liable to sudden movement one way or the other on
account of its precarious stance, is the provider of movement force behind
the exerter and expender of power. Therefore, actions to redirect
movement, or else to recompense or to adjust, in a blood-carrying being
whether animal or human, are actions of a sustainer of order - a
disciplinarian.
The inverted triangle representing consumption as well as the giving of
force to be expended by the main consciousness (as represented by the
original trigram), is a quality or attribute of that which is adaptable and
which has no form or quality. This is not a paradox, because water can be
disposed of by action, which is itself an expression of the inverted truth of
water. Therefore, actions to adjust the course of events, when undertaken
by one in the pursuit of water itself, are adjustments to this life-giving
force, in order that the purity of water can make itself manifest and the
whole being be cured. Therefore, there is a clear benefit to both the
wielder of the knife and the person being cut.